England know they have to be England, and fast

In the World Cup opener, England’s uncharacteristic batting innings was characterised by tentative shots more than full-blooded ones

Matt Roller06-Oct-2023As England’s players picked the bones out of the thrashing by New Zealand in their World Cup opener, Joe Root made a telling prediction. “I don’t think we’ll see guys getting caught mid-off or long-off check-driving anymore,” Root told the BBC. “They’ll be hitting it 20 rows back.”Root’s 77 was England’s top score and represented a welcome return to form for him after a quiet series against New Zealand last month. He was at the non-striker’s end for five of his team-mates’ dismissals and appeared to sense a pattern: with the exception of Harry Brook, England’s batters were not dismissed while trying to hit sixes.Take Jonny Bairstow. He fell looking to loft Mitchell Santner inside-out over extra cover, but with the ball angling straight in from around the wicket, rather than turning away, it hit the inner half of his bat and looped harmlessly towards wide long-off, where Daryl Mitchell took a good running catch to his left.Related

Wood: 'A great trait of the group is resilience'

New Zealand play with fire and come out unscathed

Ravindra comes of age with an innings for the dreamers

Conway and Ravindra record NZ's highest WC partnership

Buttler says England 'well below par', Root warns against panic

At the death, with England looking to accelerate, Liam Livingstone had faced four consecutive dot balls from Trent Boult when he shaped to work a knuckleball away into the gap between midwicket and long-on. Instead, his leading edge hung in the air, giving Matt Henry time to run in off the boundary to settle underneath it.Brook’s downfall came about in a fashion that would infuriate many, caught in the deep trying to hit a fourth consecutive boundary off Rachin Ravindra during an over of drag-downs. So did Moeen Ali’s, playing across the line to Glenn Phillips. While Root himself was yorked while attempting to reverse-sweep the same bowler.But England’s uncharacteristic batting innings, scraping to 282 for 9 thanks to a 30-run last-wicket stand, was characterised by tentative shots more than full-blooded ones. According to ESPNcricinfo’s ball-by-ball data, New Zealand attacked 28% of the balls they faced; England only 17%.Even Jos Buttler fell tamely. He made a clear attempt to target New Zealand’s change bowlers, hitting James Neesham and Ravindra for straight sixes. But when Henry returned, he pushed at a ball that shaped back in – “wobble-seam, trying to use the crease,” Henry explained – and was caught behind. He immediately threw his head back in frustration.England clearly tried to target New Zealand’s allrounders. With Lockie Ferguson (back) and Tim Southee (thumb) unavailable, and Ish Sodhi left out, Tom Latham had to rely on 20 overs split between Neesham, Ravindra and Phillips, who returned combined figures of 3 for 149.

“We’re not robots: sometimes you don’t play as well as you’d like. We’ll be better for the next one”Jos Buttler

But perhaps England were too deferential against New Zealand’s three main bowlers in Boult, Henry and Santner. Their combined figures were 6 for 133 in 30; Devon Conway and Ravindra showed no such caution against England’s frontline bowlers, taking down Chris Woakes, Adil Rashid and Mark Wood.Eoin Morgan, Buttler’s predecessor, was scathing in his assessment of England’s intent at the break, suggesting that they had let slip an opportunity to apply pressure after hitting Boult’s first over for 12. “You’d say that England didn’t throw many punches,” he said on Sky Sports. “They didn’t go hard enough.”After the game, he added, “They were so far off the mark. If you listened to Jos Buttler throughout the back-end of our summer, he continued to reiterate the message that you have to be more aggressive, to be brave… You have to be able to compete to say you were outplayed; for a lot of the game this evening, England didn’t compete.”1:45

Did England miss Ben Stokes?

Root expects England to be jolted into gear by their defeat. “It reinforces what we are about as a team,” he said. “We can remember how good we are, remember how intimidating we are as a batting group and double-down on it, really put sides under pressure and get those massive scores that blow teams away.”England do not need to panic. Six wins from their next eight games is almost certain to get them through to the semi-finals, and even five could be enough. “It’s one loss at the start of a very long tournament,” Buttler said. “We’re not robots: sometimes you don’t play as well as you’d like. We’ll be better for the next one.”They flew to Dharamsala on Friday ahead of their next fixture against Bangladesh on Tuesday where conditions will be very different. The weather will be cooler, the ball will travel at altitude, and a 10.30am start should ensure more uniformity across 100 overs than on Thursday, when the ball came on to the bat much better under lights.But Buttler will be frustrated that after seeming to rediscover their groove and tempo in this format last month, his batters did not exert sustained pressure on New Zealand’s bowlers. If anything, New Zealand batted more like England than England did themselves.

'How did that bowl me?' – the tale of Babar, Cummins, and a dream ball

In the past, Babar has appeared to get the better of Cummins more often than not. Against that ball, he didn’t have a chance

Alex Malcolm27-Dec-20233:55

Malcolm: ‘Cummins made something happen out of nothing’

Babar Azam stepped forward to play a front-foot defensive stroke. Then he heard the death rattle. Then he heard the collective roar of 44,837 Australian fans.His head snapped back in disbelief to see the bails dislodged. He turned his head forward again to look at where the ball had pitched, several inches outside the line of off stump. His front knee remained bent in the position it was when he played the stroke. His lips were unmoved, but his mind was whirling.” ball bowled ? [How did I get bowled to that?]”His eyes tracked down along the line of the ball’s path from where it pitched to where it hit his stumps, checking again to confirm that his mind wasn’t playing tricks on him.” ball bowled [That bowl me].”Related

What's happened to Babar Azam's Test batting?

The Cummins show that deserves a pat and defines his legacy

Stats – Cummins' rare captaincy double, and Babar's quiet 2023

Shafique rues Pakistan's batting collapse: 'As a batter you have to take your chances'

Pakistan, and the familiar sigh of resignation

He started walking to the dressing room. He took one look at his batting partner Shan Masood, who shook his head in disbelief. Babar said nothing. He turned to the scoreboard for a glimpse at the replay.There it was in full view. The ball whizzed out of Pat Cummins’ fingertips. The seam wobbled violently through the air. It pitched where Babar thought it would. His bat had gone to the line it started on. The wobbling seam hit the pitch and jagged sharply past Babar’s inside edge and clipped the top of off stump. Babar bowed his head and walked off.

****

Before the start of this series, Babar had seen Cummins run in at him 208 times in Test cricket and not once did he need to leave the arena immediately after. From those 208 balls, he had scored 122 runs, hitting 15 boundaries. In those seven innings, Babar made scores 104, 97, 36, 36, 196, 67 and 55 on very good batting surfaces at the Gabba, Adelaide Oval, Rawalpindi, Karachi and Lahore.For those who have had the misfortune of facing Cummins at any level of cricket, it was mind-blowing to watch the amount of time Babar had against one of the best fast bowlers ever. He propped forward time and again, particularly on the low, slow, lifeless pitches in Pakistan, and played Cummins with ease. Meeting good-length balls with the full face of the bat and placing them wherever he liked. The ball melted off the middle of the blade after it had come off the surface like it had bounced off a pillow. Even though the pitches were slow, Babar’s skill was still exceptional. Few players in the world have made Cummins look so pedestrian, even in subcontinental conditions.But facing Cummins on spicy pitches in Australia, particularly at Perth Stadium, and the new look MCG since curator Matt Page has breathed new life into its previously dull drop-ins, is a completely different beast.Anyone who has faced Cummins on these types of pitches in Australia will attest to the fact that it is unlike anything else. You can face bowlers of similar size and stature and of similar or even quicker speed, but from Cummins, the ball comes down differently.Elite batters programme their minds to pick length from the hand in an instant. What they see dictates whether they go forward or back, whether they leave or play, whether they attack or defend. The sheer volume of balls they face and their experience means the signal from the eyes to the brain can predict the length in an instant.Pat Cummins wheels away in celebration after cleaning up Babar Azam•Getty Images and Cricket AustraliaYou know what a five-metre length looks like from the hand, and trust that you get forward and find the middle of the bat with a forward defence.But that length from Cummins doesn’t hit the middle of the bat. Because of his release point, the counter-rotation in his torso, the whip of his arm, and his partially amputated middle finger, the ball hits that length and climbs like it’s bounced from a trampoline. Instead of hitting the middle of the bat, it hits the splice. The cane in the handle vibrates like a tuning fork. Defending the ball feels like you’re jackhammering concrete.That’s what Babar experienced in the second innings in Perth. Cummins was relentless for 16 deliveries at him. Angling in from wide of the crease towards off stump and climbing from a length. Every ball Babar defended hit the sticker of the bat hard. Babar tried to prop forward to defend but ended up standing up from the crease. Cummins zipped in two bouncers to keep him guessing, one which took off past Babar’s head and over Alex Carey’s leaping glove to run away to the fence.The 16th ball was angled into off with a wobbling seam, Babar had to defend on the front foot from the crease, it spat from a length and nipped away to clip the padding on the thumb of the bottom glove that was holding the handle and floated through to Carey. Babar had tried to hit the ball with the middle of his bat but the bounce was so severe that it made contact with his right thumb.Babar Azam was cleaned up by a Pat Cummins indipper•Getty Images and Cricket Australia

****

Babar walked out at 124 for 2 in Melbourne to face Cummins for the first time since that Perth dismissal. Masood and Abdullah Shafique had batted beautifully as the pitch looked to settle. But out of nowhere Cummins had forced Shafique into an error, claiming a stunning return catch.Babar took guard out of his crease to try and negate Cummins’ length and extra bounce. First ball, Cummins went back of a length at 137kph, fourth-stump line, Babar had to stand up on his toes and defend. Second ball, Cummins delivered the same length but on a fifth-stump line and Babar got squared up defending from the crease away from his body, wary of nicking off again.Third ball, slightly fuller, fourth-stump line, finally Babar can properly press forward and cover the line to avoid getting an edge. It snaked through the gate. Death rattle.”It’s a dream ball. It’s what you try most balls, but it’s rare that it comes off,” Cummins said after play. “That wasn’t a deliberate ball to seam in. That’s 50-50 that it’s going to seam in or out. Try and create a bit of an angle and if I don’t know what it’s doing, hopefully the batter doesn’t know either.”Babar didn’t know. He’s faced 40 balls from Cummins in this series so far and has been dismissed twice for 15 runs.Pakistan slumped from 124 for 1 to 194 for 6 at stumps, trailing by 124. Cummins had taken 3 for 37 from 14 overs.

Stats – The shortest Test between South Africa and India

South Africa’s dominance in Centurion, Rohit vs Rabada, and more

Sampath Bandarupalli28-Dec-2023163 First-innings lead conceded by India in Centurion. It was the fourth-lowest lead they conceded when they suffered an innings defeat. It was also the first time in 40 years that India lost a Test by an innings despite falling less than 200 runs behind after the first innings.The last such instance was against West Indies at Eden Gardens in 1983, where they were bowled out for 90 after conceding a 136-run lead in the first innings.1 Innings wins for South Africa since their readmission in 1992 with a first-innings lead of less than 163. They had defeated England by an innings and 12 runs at Lord’s in 2022 despite a lead of only 161 runs.7.66 South Africa’s win-loss ratio in Test cricket at SuperSport Park in Centurion. It is the joint-highest for any team at a venue where they played 20 or more Tests. Pakistan also have a 7.66 win-loss ratio at Karachi’s National Stadium.South Africa have won 23 of the 29 matches they have played at SuperSport Park, a win percentage of 79.31, the highest for any team at a venue in Test cricket.ESPNcricinfo Ltd2 Innings wins for South Africa at home against India, both in Centurion. The first one came in 2010, when they won by an innings and 25 runs.1263 Balls bowled in the Centurion Test, making it the shortest completed Test between South Africa and India. The previous shortest was the Ranchi Test in 2019, lasting 1325 balls.34.1 Overs India’s second innings lasted, their joint-shortest all-out innings in South Africa. In 1996 as well, they were bowled in 34.1 overs in Dubran, for 66.Their second-innings total of 131 is their third-lowest in South Africa, after 66 and 100 they posted in that 1996 Durban Test.51 Test wickets for Kagiso Rabada against India. He became the fifth South Africa bowler to take 50 or more Test wickets against India.12.8 Rohit Sharma’s batting average in South Africa. It is the second-lowest for any player with at least ten innings in top six in the country. Mohammad Hafeez averaged 11.83 in 12 innings he batted in South Africa. Rohit’s average against Rabada in South Africa is 6.2, with five dismissals in six innings.

SA20 breakout star Ottniel Baartman stakes his claim for a World Cup spot

Coming off two stellar domestic seasons and having got Sunrisers Eastern Cape into the final of the SA20, the fast bowler is hoping his time is now

Firdose Moonda07-Mar-2024As the star of the second season of the SA20, Ottniel Baartman has made headlines, but he is not exactly happy about it.”There is a hype about it and for me, personally, I don’t like it,” Baartman says during a first-class match at Newlands. “The media can make or break you, just like one bad performance can put you on the back foot. But I do feel I am on the map now.”He is, and in a big way.Baartman was the SA20’s leading bowler until the final, when he was leapfrogged by his team-mate Marco Jansen. Baartman was part of an attack that dominated the competition – all three top wicket-takers came from Sunrisers Eastern Cape (SEC) – and he helped his team become champions the second year running by taking an eye-popping 4 for 10 in the first qualifier, giving them a direct route to the final.He also did all of that in a T20 World Cup year, where bilateral fixtures are so scant that national coach Rob Walter has made it clear the SA20 and CSA domestic T20 challenge will inform his final selection. South Africa last played T20Is against India in December and won’t play any before their World Cup squad travels to West Indies ahead of the World Cup. So it’s no surprise that Baartman finds himself in the conversation. “All the messages I get and all the calls are from people telling me, ‘You are next in line for the World Cup.’ I don’t want to give them an answer because I don’t know selection.”Related

  • South Africa name uncapped Daryn Dupavillon and Ottniel Baartman in Pakistan Test squad (2021)

  • CSA Provincial T20 Cup: Muthusamy, Baartman impress; SA U-19s flounder

  • SA20 booming as Sunrisers do the business again

But Baartman’s SA20 coach, Adi Birrell, who pre-signed him for SEC after seeing him playing for his provincial side, South Western Districts, a few seasons ago, does, and he believes the case has been made. “His alignment was very good. He runs in straight, follows through straight, and not much can go wrong with his technique. So it’s easy for me to say that, of course, he has got to go [to the World Cup], because he has done so well, but I haven’t sat down and looked at the options,” he says.”What I will say is that this is his time. He is at the top of his game. Too often, not only South Africa but teams in general go for the young guys with potential, instead of picking the guy who is at the absolute peak of his powers. You need to win the trophy now, and so right now you need people that are in form. I feel he should be going.”Baartman and Nandre Burger (right) were part of the limited-overs squad for the series against India last December, but Baartman didn’t get a game, while Burger made his debut•Getty ImagesBirrell’s point rings true for as recently as the last T20 World Cup in Australia, where South Africa exited in the group stage after a poor chase and defeat to Netherlands. Leading into the tournament, opening batter Reeza Hendricks scored four successive half-centuries on a tour of England and Ireland but did not get a game at the World Cup because of the presence of Quinton de Kock and captain Temba Bavuma, who had returned from injury and struggled for runs. Birrell didn’t say it but South Africa can ill afford a repeat of that.Could Baartman fit in? A first-choice South Africa line-up will include some combination of Kagiso Rabada, Lungi Ngidi, Jansen, Anrich Nortje and Gerald Coetzee (if both of the last two are fit). Andile Phehlukwayo, Lizaad Williams and Nandre Burger are also in the mix, which suggests it’s a crowded field, but the advantage Baartman has could lie in the conditions.While the drop-in pitch in Nassau County, New York, will be a mystery until the tournament begins – South Africa will play three of their four group-stage matches there – they then move to the Caribbean islands, where surfaces are said to be somewhat similar in character to St George’s Park, scene of much of Baartman’s SA20 success, or Kingsmead, where he plays his domestic cricket.Baartman himself wouldn’t go that far, because he genuinely does not know what to expect. “I’ve never been outside of South Africa” he says. “So I don’t know any of the grounds or what to expect. If I go, it will be a first for me.”And a fairytale story for a sportsman who had the odds against him from the beginning.Unlike many of the athletes who advance to the national team, especially in cricket and rugby, Baartman did not go to an elite private school or come from one of the bigger provinces. He grew up in Oudtshoorn, a town in the Western Cape, inland and about equidistant from Cape Town and Gqeberha, best known for its ostrich farms. He still lives there and describes it as a “small town with a small community”, where “there are a lot of good sportsmen but they are not going anywhere”.That’s partly because they are encouraged to concentrate on other things, like getting a good education. “I had the opportunity to go to a private school but my mother did not recommend that,” Baartman says. “It was one of those things where they just focused on sport and not academics. For us, it was: you have to learn first before you can play sport.”Baartman was adjudged the bowler of the SA20 2024 season for his 18 wickets, pipping team-mate Marco Jansen•SA 20Still, Baartman enjoyed the game, kept playing and started his career in his hometown. He eventually had to move to a bigger centre to turn professional. He was offered a rookie contract in Bloemfontein and spent three years there with Knights, who opted not to renew his deal after the first pandemic summer of 2019-20, so he moved to Dolphins. “My career started to go up from there. They had all the facilities and some world class coaches,” he says.In the 2021-22 season, Baartman was the leading bowler in the CSA Provincial T20 Cup with 11 wickets at 10.09. The following summer, he was second-highest in the CSA T20 Challenge with 15 wickets at 14.40. Throughout, he showed himself to be “very competitive and quite astute with his tactics – clever cricketer,” Birrell says. “He looks for the tough overs. And we trusted him with the big overs: at the back end of the Powerplay and the death.”That’s because Baartman’s speciality is the yorker. He learnt it in his youth “playing street cricket, because we used to just hit the stumps as many times as we could and I feel like it started there,” he says. “It was about how many yorkers you could bowl in a row.”These days he calls it his “go-to delivery”, which explains why he was used so extensively at the death by SEC. In the qualifier, he had Heinrich Klaasen caught behind off a wide, yorker-length delivery in the 17th over, to all but end Durban’s Super Giants’ chase. But it’s also not the only ball he has become known for. “His seam-up ball is pretty good too,” Birrell says. “And then he has got a bumper and a bouncer.”In SEC’s first win of their SA20 2024 campaign, Baartman took 3 for 35 against Mumbai Indians Cape Town, dismissing Dewald Brevis and Liam Livingstone with short balls. Asked how many variations he has, Baartman wasn’t sure but listed the knuckleball among them. “I feel that delivery and the yorker are the two I can get away with when the pressure is on.”He has a few more opportunities to show his worth over the next seven weeks when he will be in action for Dolphins in the CSA T20 Challenge that starts on Friday and concludes at the end of April. All eight Division 1 provincial teams will play the other seven both home and away, for a total of 14 matches, before the knockouts. With no IPL deal calling Baartman, he is expected to be able to fully participate in this tournament and make himself impossible to leave behind when South Africa name their World Cup squad in May.”He is just a really great talent and it’s pretty raw. He didn’t go to fancy schools. He has trod that other path,” Birrell says. “And he is a favourite in our team. Very popular. He will be an asset.”

The no-look six is worth a look – and then some

Batters in T20 are hitting the ball miles and not caring to see where it has gone. It might seem like flex, but that’s not all it is

Osman Samiuddin01-Apr-2024MS Dhoni famously hit a monster back in 2009. Martin Guptill’s been hitting them since around the same time, often enough so that he could be seen as a pioneer – except, he’s from New Zealand, so is hardly going to go round screaming “Trademark”. Instead, if pushed, people might recall Andre Fletcher as the first guy to blow it into their lives. And these days, it is everywhere.We are on – in case you hadn’t worked out the fairly tenuous link between the three names – the no-look six, the season’s new aesthetic must-have. All the white-ball kids are trying it. It lives rent-free on Tik Tok. It’s also what drags cricket into the brotherhood of Big Sport, the no-look six carrying the same brio – or is it hubris? – as the no-look pass in football and basketball, and the no-look winner in tennis.The name is slightly disingenuous, of course. It’s not that batters are not looking at the ball as they strike it. That fundamental, of keeping eyes on the ball till impact, remains (and actually stands reinforced). No-look here refers to the subversion of the instinct to watch where the ball has gone it has been hit, whether it is to make sure it was hit right, to simply admire the handiwork, or basic game awareness.The other day in the IPL, Dewald Brevis had the cheek to dish one out to Rashid Khan, a mighty six over long-off that looked all wrong but was all right. His bat’s arc swung across his own body, so it looked for all the world like he had sliced the shot, but which was to help him keep the head down at impact. And he kept it down, not needing to see what he would have known as soon as he struck it, that this one was going big.Only a week before, Rashid was breaking the internet with his own outrageous no-look six, in Sharjah against Ireland. He flipped the ball over deep square leg and then, head bowed and bat upright by his left shoulder, held a pose that looked a bit like an old man getting the dab wrong.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by IPL (@iplt20)

Brevis is such an accomplished player of the shot that last year Suryakumar Yadav was telling him needed to learn the shot from Brevis. It was a slightly confected conversation admittedly, but still, it was some kudos. The game’s foremost 360-degree batter wants the secrets of your shot. A batter who, by the way, broke a fridge in the team dugout once with his own no-look shot.Although it is everywhere, the shot is still in that moment of evolution where each time it’s played, it is an event, fresh enough that each subsequent one is legitimately the best one you’ve seen yet. YouTube compilations of it are sprouting like bacterial colonies, which means two things. Every kid is going to start aping it at every level. And from here on in, in this world of quick-hit highlights and sugar-rush digital clips, there will never exist a bad-looking no-look shot.Already on social media the shot has acquired a force of its own. Khawaja Nafay catapulted into the BPL and then the PSL this season with minimal cricket in any official pathways. Plenty of club cricket in Karachi. Also plenty of Facebook videos of him hitting immaculate no-look shots, *videos that went viral and took him to those two international T20 leagues.Last month at the PSL, meanwhile, was an opportunity to watch some of the best-looking no-look hits, courtesy Saim Ayub. Ayub is a wisp of a batter, lovely to watch when he’s going leg side. His no-look shot is a shy and sly little dab over his right shoulder that generally fizzes away for six. Instead of swivelling around and watching the ball fly off, Ayub remains crouched, head down looking at the pitch. Occasionally, like everyone else in the stadium, he gives in to the impulse to see where the ball has gone, but he checks himself immediately, as if in admonishment: do not look. Some people are reminded of Saeed Anwar when they watch Ayub flick over square leg. I am not one (yet) but if Anwar was around today, pioneer that he was, he’d be playing the no-look.What makes the no-look special, what sets it apart, is that it comes off as a pure brag (and unlike football and basketball, is not really a tactical ploy to throw off the opponent). Most strokeplay in cricket is fixed as a response, a solution to the problems posed by the delivery and the fields set for it. No gap on the leg side? Reverse sweep. No fielder behind the keeper? Dilscoop. Two men at deep square and deep midwicket? Arch back and ramp.The Andre Fletcher method, at work in the ILT20•ILT20The no-look can be played to any kind of field and most kinds of deliveries. It can be an orthodox shot – in some footage from Mumbai Indians nets , Brevis hits what looks to be no-look cover drives – or unorthodox ones. The batter doesn’t need to see the consequences of his actions; he is so sure of them. No, the no-look shot is no response. It is the ultimate supremacy, the logical endpoint of a format that has indulged and enabled batting more than any other. It is inevitable; the establishment establishing.Nobody does the showing off like Fletcher, whipping one away over midwicket, adding a flourish with bat and one with the eyes as he glares back at the bowler, upturning conventions of who glares at whom in cricket’s central confrontation. Dhoni’s no-look is a cold, uncaring assertion of authority, a dismissal of the unworthy. But the inherent flex in the shot is so powerful that even Guptill, nice Kiwi and all, can’t help but come across all peacocky like KP when he plays it.A little footnote, which should actually be part of the main text, is that the shot is not only a brag. In fact, that might be the least of it, a mere side effect. In reality, there is a rigorous technical rationale underpinning it. Ball-striking, whether a stationary ball in golf or a moving one, is most efficient when the body stays low through the swing and impact. Batters and golfers talk of staying in the shot and not lifting up, so all the power and weight from the torque of the torso, shoulders and hip is going the shot. And then, at impact, absolute stillness, eyes locked in.That’s what stands out most watching Brevis – or even Tom Kohler-Cadmore – hit the no-look shot. It’s less swag, more functional, a transferral of extensive drill work from the nets into matches. If there is showing off at all, it is of the strength of the position they get into when hitting.It sounds slightly dorky. Good thing it looks anything but.*Links to TikTok videos do not work on internet networks in India and elsewhere where TikTok is banned

India defend a record low as head-to-head reaches 7-1

All the key stats from a low-scoring thriller in New York

Sampath Bandarupalli09-Jun-20241:56

Rapid Fire Review: Is it curtains for Pakistan’s WC campaign?

119 – The score India defended successfully against Pakistan on Sunday. It is the joint-lowest total any team has successfully defended at the Men’s T20 World Cup in a 20-over game. Sri Lanka also successfully defended 119 against New Zealand in the 2014 edition.1 – The target of 120 is also the lowest India have successfully defended in a full 20-over game in men’s T20Is. The previous lowest was 139 against Zimbabwe in 2016 in Harare.The 120 total is also the second-lowest target Pakistan lost chasing in the format, behind the 119 against Zimbabwe in 2021.

Related

Kirsten bemoans Pakistan's 'poor decision-making'

Bumrah spearheads India's defence of 119; Pakistan on brink of elimination

Rohit on Bumrah: 'He's a genius with the ball'

7-1 – India’s head-to-head record against Pakistan in Men’s T20 World Cups, including one win via bowl-out in 2007. Their only defeat against Pakistan came in the 2021 edition in Dubai.The seven wins by India against Pakistan are the most for any team against an opponent at the Men’s T20 World Cups. Pakistan have won all their six meetings against Bangladesh, while Sri Lanka have won six of their eight games against West Indies.48 – Runs that Pakistan failed to chase in the last eight overs (13-20) despite having eight wickets in hand. These are the fewest runs any Full Member team failed to score in the final eight overs with eight or more wickets in hand in a men’s T20I (where ball-by-ball data is available).Lowest scores defended in men’s T20 WC•ESPNcricinfo LtdThe previous lowest was 52 runs by Australia against England in 2020, losing while chasing 163 from 111 for 1. Afghanistan also failed to chase 52 in 2020 against Ireland in pursuit of 143 from 91 for 2. They finished with 142 to tie the game but lost in the Super Over.6 – Instances of a team winning the match despite being bowled out while batting first in the Men’s T20 World Cup. The 19 overs batted by India before getting bowled out are the fewest among those six instances. It is also the first instance of India winning a T20I despite being bowled out while batting first.7.23 – Average runs scored per wicket in the last ten overs by India and Pakistan in New York. It is the second-worst average in a men’s T20I between Full Members, where ten or more wickets fell in the last ten overs across both innings. The lowest is 6.63 between Bangladesh and Australia in 2021.38 – Runs scored by India from the halfway mark where they were 81 for 3. These are the second-fewest by a Full Member team in men’s T20Is after scoring 80-plus runs in the first ten overs for the loss of three or fewer wickets (where ball-by-ball data is available).The lowest is 28 runs by Bangladesh in the 2014 T20 World Cup against Hong Kong. Bangladesh were all out for 108 after being 80 for 3 at the end of the tenth.

8 – Men’s T20Is between India and Pakistan since the start of 2014. The toss-winning team chose to bowl in all those eight and won the match in seven, except Sunday’s match in New York.

When Chennai hosted its first women's Test: 'They came to watch the cricket, not just to see if the girls could play'

On the eve of India women’s first Test in Chennai in 48 years, former players Shantha Rangaswamy, Sudha Shah and Shubhangi Kulkarni reminisce about their first Test there in 1976

Sruthi Ravindranath27-Jun-2024The north-east monsoon had just set in when India and West Indies arrived in Madras (now Chennai) in November 1976. It was the second match of the first-ever official women’s Test series in India. For the first Test, in Bangalore, the stadium was almost full. Not that it was something new for the India players: even the matches they played unofficially previously had drawn massive crowds.And the Chepauk crowd? The stadium was three-fourths full, even on days it rained. Ask Shantha Rangaswamy, the captain of that India side, and she falls back on that old chestnut: the “knowledgeable crowd”.Shubhangi Kulkarni, India’s legspinner, who finished as the highest wicket-taker in that series, faintly recollects the Tamil Nadu Cricket Association trying to bring girls from a nearby school in to watch the match.”My first impression was that the crowd knew their cricket,” Kulkarni says. “They were genuinely applauding the performance. They came to watch the cricket, unlike when we played in 1975 in various cities – the crowd [there] came to see whether the girls played in skirts or pants, you know. They [the Chennai crowd] were cheering both teams, cheering good performances.”Related

  • India head into Chennai Test with an eye on 2025 Women's ODI World Cup

  • Sudha Shah: We don't want to be compared to the men

  • Shanta Rangaswamy: 'No one can take the pride away from us' (2017)

Madras, however, would not see another women’s Test for 48 years. Since that Test, India have gone on to play 39 more, 22 of them in India – four in Lucknow, three in Mumbai, three in Delhi, and the rest in various other cities. But none in Chennai.They will be returning to Chennai for the first time since 2007, when they played an ODI Quadrangular Series there, to face South Africa in a one-off Test starting June 28.Current India head coach Amol Muzumdar acknowledges the significance of playing at the venue. “It’s a historic ground and we are aware of the history that this place carries. Even though a lot of cricket has not been played on this ground [by women’s sides], we are still aware of what the demands are, the pitch and the ground. We’ll try to cater to that in the coming days.”There’s barely any information out there about the 1976 Test played at Chepauk, barring a basic scorecard. It is evident that the match wasn’t completed; West Indies and India played an innings each. India declared at 218 for 9, Rangaswamy and Diana Edulji both top-scoring with 57.Sudha Shah, who has played the most Tests for India, was the Madras local in the squad. A regular at the stadium for long, she had her entire family cheering for her from the stands in that match. She made 18 runs, getting out to Patricia Whittaker.A newspaper reports on the first day’s play of the first official women’s Test in India, in Bengaluru”It’s a punishment to make me recollect what happened 48 years back,” she says, breaking into laughter. But it doesn’t take long to jog her memory.”I played the ball, it looped out and it ricocheted off the slip fielder’s head… the gully took the catch. Everyone was saying, ‘What luck!’ None of us top-order batters scored , if I remember.”Shah remembers correctly. India’s top three were dismissed for 15, 7 and 18. Then Rangaswamy came in.”I played to build the innings, Diana played the finisher’s job,” says Rangaswamy. “Diana went hammer and tongs. She got a quickfire 50-odd, while I had to build my innings to get my fifty.”Not only did Rangaswamy anchor the innings, she also got two wickets with the ball in the game. Remarkably, she also remembers how she got the two batters out.”Pat Whittaker was caught at slips by Sudha,” she says. “I dismissed Beverly Browne with an inswinging yorker.”The match was not telecast live but there was press coverage for the entire series. Rangaswamy remembers a description of the reception she got from the Chepauk crowd in a newspaper report, in the .”It went: ‘Her arrival was greeted with cheers as is normally given to the Nawab of Pataudi and Ajit Wadekar, the other captains of India. She got a rousing send-off after her half-century’, and things like that.”West Indies ended up playing just 29 overs in the rain-hit game, making 41 for 4. Kulkarni did not bowl in the game owing to a finger injury, but the five-for she picked up in the drawn Bangalore Test had given India the hope that spinners could be crucial in keeping West Indies quiet.”We sensed that the gap wasn’t that big and because our spinners were so good, and particularly because we were playing on our wickets, which wasn’t really suiting them, we had a positive mindset that we could go for a win,” Kulkarni says.Sudha Shah (leftmost) and Shubhangi Kulkarni (rightmost) would go on to occupy important roles in the coaching and administrative setup of women’s cricket in India•Getty ImagesThe historic first Test win came in Patna, in the fourth Test of the series. The players were floored by the fans’ reaction to the win. “Right from the ground to the hotel there were crowds and even when we went to the hotel, there were people outside,” Shah says. “So we went to the balcony to wave to them. It was a thrill at the time because we’d never come across anything like that.”With the women not getting paid to play, they were treated to food or juice by the manager after a good performance.”We never got paid, in my entire cricket career,” Rangaswamy says. “Our love for the game was more. We did it for passion, not money. But I remember in Chennai, I think both the captains – Louise [Browne] and I – got a gold chain with a pendant shaped like a ball from Vummidi Bangaru Jewellers or someone.”On Friday, Shah, who is a Chepauk regular, will be at the stadium, cheering for India from the stands. “A few of us [former team-mates] are planning on going to watch the game together,” she says.Rangaswamy, who’s currently in the US, says she’ll be watching the match on TV despite the odd timings. She watched all three ODIs India played against South Africa last week, and she’s looking forward to watching her favourite, Smriti Mandhana, and her recent favourite Shubha Satheesh, play in the Test.

****

Be it cheering the opposition even when their own team loses, or turning out in massive numbers just to watch their favourite cricketer practice, you can’t talk about Chepauk without mentioning the crowd.For Radha and Parth, members of the Bucket Hat Cult, a fan group dedicated to women’s sport, it doesn’t get better than watching their favourite team play at the iconic venue for the first ever time. The group – identified by their “uniform”, the bucket hat – has been a notable presence whenever the women’s team has played in Mumbai since India’s Test against England there in 2023.Their catchy chants and songs – one of them goes, “Jingle bell, jingle bell, jingle all the way. Oh what fun it is to watch Deepti play all day” – even got players to notice them. “Smriti Mandhana and Jemimah Rodrigues wanted to meet us after the game and appreciated our support,” Parth says.Members of the Bucket Hat Cult, a group of women’s sport enthusiasts, will be at the first Women’s Test in Chennai in 48 years•Bucket Hat Cult Considering how strong the Chennai Super Kings fan base is, Radha thinks it won’t take too long for women’s cricket to pick up in the city. The TNCA has made tickets free for the match, and there are hopes a sizeable crowd will turn up, especially on the weekend.”Just look at what RCB [in the WPL] has done for the Bengaluru crowd,” she says. “From a fan’s perspective, it is pretty evident that women’s matches are just scheduled in Mumbai or neighbouring stadiums without much thought for growing the fan base across the country.”Away from the stadium, 84-year old Vijaya Subramanian, a cricket aficionado who lives in Chennai, will be cheering the women on from her home. Her father introduced her to the sport when she was around six years old and even taught her how to create a cricket scorecard. From the age of 11, she started keeping a cricket diary, in which she meticulously jotted down scores off TV or radio commentary.”She lived for a while in Kolkata, where she never missed a game – be it men’s or women’s – before moving back to Chennai,” her son, Karthik, says. “She watches all the games irrespective of the time. Her memory isn’t great right now. We remember names like Shantha Rangaswamy, Sudha Shah and Diana Edulji now because she used to talk about them so much.”Vijaya’s face lights up when she hears the players’ names. “I’m sure I heard the radio commentary for this match in Kolkata,” she says. “I remember they played well in that series. Rangaswamy used to play so consistently.”Will she be watching the one-off Test starting Friday?”,” [I’ll definitely watch] she says.

Magic moments – Bumrah, Klaasen and SKY go flash, bam, alakazam

Virat Kohli did too, a little bit, as the India vs South Africa T20 World Cup final gave us many memories to cherish

Alagappan Muthu29-Jun-20241:23

Flower: ‘Fascinating game of cat and mouse from Rohit’

A catch for the ages

It went up and there was sky. It came down, and there was SKY again. Suryakumar Yadav on the long-off boundary in the 20th over, with 15 runs to defend, pulled off a catch that will be talked about like Kapil Dev’s from 1983.Related

  • T20 World Cup 2024 – a zero for Bumrah, and other curious numbers

  • South African cricket begins the long process of pulling itself back together

  • Sometimes sports can be messy and without any explanation

  • History weighs heavy as South Africa die another death

  • Rohit: It's not what we did today, it is what we have done for three-four years

It was a full toss from Hardik Pandya. A wide full toss. Perhaps a mangling of a wide yorker. David Miller connected more off the bottom of the bat, but still it flew. Suryakumar was haring to his left. At full tilt. He was stretching. He shouldn’t have had any balance out there going as fast as he was, but he did. Somehow. The ball came down just in front of him and he caught it. But he wasn’t done. Because he was so close to the rope. Barely inches from it. So he tossed the ball up, high enough that he could step over the boundary, collect himself, step back in, and keep control of the ball all the way through. Catches win matches. This one won a World Cup.

Genius at play

It was an old ball. It looked scruffy. It shouldn’t be doing these things for a fast bowler. But Jasprit Bumrah is not just a fast bowler. He is miracle made flesh. With South Africa needing 21 from 15 balls, he went wide of the crease. He landed it outside off. It screamed in between bat and pad and brought down Marco Jansen’s castle with him looking utterly bewildered. This was movement off the pitch. The seam pointing in. One side of the ball ragged. The other slightly less so. Reverse? The things Bumrah does escapes the realm of sense and meaning. No one can be that good when this much is on the line.

Klaasen goes boom

One of these days, Heinrich Klaasen is going to hit a cricket ball so hard it breaks in two. He hit five sixes during a hair-raising knock. One of them, with the wind, just flew flat and hard over extra cover. Another went into the wind, and still had enough on it to clatter on to the roof. The power he has is unbelievable. Klaasen hit 70% (seven of ten) of South Africa’s boundaries while he was at the crease and four of them in a single over against a previously unhittable Axar Patel. It was remarkable and he was doing it with such ease. In a World Cup final. In a South Africa shirt. For a little while, it really did feel like the curse was going to be broken.Suryakumar Yadav pulled off a catch that will be talked about like Kapil Dev’s from 1983•ICC/Getty Images

The trap that wasn’t, but was

Quinton de Kock hitting over square leg is inevitable. And that swing of his bat. Starts up high. Comes down smooth. Fully uninhibited. In the old days, Sanath Jayasuriya used to be the master of this shot. And he used to play it the same way. On instinct. So when de Kock had the opportunity to unleash it, in the 13th over of the game, he took it and found six. India immediately stationed a man there. It wasn’t meant to be a trap, because it was right there in plain view, but it worked like one. Arshdeep Singh bowled the same ball. De Kock played the same shot. Only Kuldeep Yadav was there to catch it.

Kohli pulls up the anchor

Virat Kohli was playing a strange innings. He was 14 off five. Then he was 36 off 43. He’d hit only four boundaries in 48 deliveries. He and India were working on the theory that a par score would be enough. This was a final. That does things to people. So a man who had embraced a more attacking game went back to find that old trusty anchor and dropped it all the way down. Then the 18th over came along. A six and a four off Kagiso Rabada. The same dose to Jansen. India got 33 runs in two overs. Kohli finished with 26 off his last 11 balls. Later that night, he was crowned champion.

Meet India's oldest living Test cricketer, who played the game because it was fun

CD Gopinath talks about facing Ray Lindwall and Sonny Ramadhin, and being part of India’s first Test win

Alagappan Muthu16-Oct-20243:25

CD Gopinath: “There was no strategy on how we were going to beat England”

As CD Gopinath starts talking about cricket, it becomes clear that India’s oldest living Test cricketer has a mischievous soul.”See, when a legspinner bowls, and the ball is spinning, you cut him, the ball will go like this,” he says, extending his right arm and performing a clockwise turn. “I love watching it. I’ve seen fielders thinking the ball will come straight to them, but it bounces and goes somewhere else and they couldn’t stop it. I loved playing that shot and I loved seeing that happen.”Just as he enjoyed watching flummoxed fielders during his career, which included eight Tests for India, Gopinath, now 94, enjoys making light of that time in history.”Some people from the UK came and interviewed me on the Test match that India won for the first time in 1952. I think they were going to write a book or make a video, and I said to them: How can you write a book on one Test match? One season or five Test matches, okay. Why only this Test match? What is there to write so much about? They said, ‘No, we regard that win as a turning point of the cricket history of India.’ In one way it is true. And I am very lucky. I had that for India and I had that for Madras. I asked them: Who else are you interviewing? They said, ‘Nobody else, because there’s nobody else alive. You are the only one from that team that is there.’ I said, ‘So I can say anything I want!”Unfortunately, the lore that surrounds that victory, by an innings and eight runs over England in Madras, is disappointingly strait-laced. And Gopinath did not go through with his scandalous idea of saying whatever he wanted. He did, however, escort that crew to Chepauk to show them exactly where he took the catch to dismiss Brian Statham, England’s eighth wicket in the second innings, which brought India to the brink of history.Related

  • Sailing with the stars (2016)

  • When I met India's oldest living Test cricketer (2016)

  • 'Why I was dropped is still an unsolved mystery' (2014)

  • The India I remember (2011)

India were well worth the 1-1 scoreline. They parked memories of Wally Hammond bashing them around and Alec Bedser tying them up in knots in previous years to begin the five-match series with back-to-back 400-plus first-innings totals. Then, in Kanpur, they came undone on a spin-friendly pitch and were left with only one chance to level the series. The batting had class – having already contributed five hundreds to England’s two – and that number would rise further in Madras, where Polly Umrigar scored a crucial 130 not out from No. 7, which turned 216 for 5 to an eventually match-winning 457 for 9 declared. Gopinath was at the other end when Umrigar got his hundred. Shortly after Statham hit Vinoo Mankad up in the air, after 20 years of trying, India had pulled off something they never thought possible.”[The crew] asked me how I felt,” Gopinath said, “and I said, look, my job was, as a fielder, I had to take the catch. It’s not an achievement. If you can’t take a catch, why would you be in the team? Yes, we were very pleased that we won, because we didn’t expect to win. That too against England, we never thought we’d ever win. We were very happy, but beyond that, there was no… [at] that time nobody demonstrated. They didn’t make fists and things like that.”Today when a fellow takes a catch, the whole team runs there – carries him, kisses him, hugs him – not only in cricket, in every game. In football, when someone scores a goal, they almost smother him. Those days you were not meant to express yourself openly out to the world. The catch I held was a straightforward, simple catch, nothing to it. If you held a brilliant catch somewhere in the slips, someone may say: ‘Well held.’ That’s it. You didn’t go running around the whole ground or carrying people. It was considered vulgar to show your feelings to the outside world. So our celebration at the end of that game was: we went to the dressing room, we said to each other, ‘Well done’, we packed up and went home. That was the end of the matter.Gopinath on the tour of England in 1952•Edward G Malindine/Getty Images”Maybe it didn’t quite dawn on us, because we were the weak team. When we went into that Test match, we didn’t expect to win. We were not even trying to. If we draw, we were very happy. was like winning a match. So long as we didn’t lose. That was the first time that we realised, oh, it’s also possible to win. You realise, oh, it’s also possible to score hundreds or 200s.”Gopinath’s lack of excitement – apart from being typical of his era – might also stem from the fact that he never had any intention of becoming a cricketer. That was destiny’s doing, placing him in the same college house as the captain at Madras Christian College, creating a situation where they needed, first, a wicketkeeper – “They saw me playing tennis, so they called me and said your job is to not let the ball pass you” – and then an opener (“You mean face the new ball? No way I can do that”). Except he did, and began scoring a lot of runs.”I got a duck in both innings of my Ranji Trophy debut, so [team-mate] Balu Alagannan came to me and said, ‘Hey, watch out. Bad things come in threes.’ Next match, I was so scared. It was all I could think about. I don’t even know how I got to the crease but somehow I got there and I got off the mark.”Gopinath was an uncut gem. “When I was young, I didn’t know anything. I suppose what happened was, my reflexes were good, my footwork was good, my eye was good. I could hit the ball.”So the cricket association sent him to train with Bert Wensley, the former Sussex allrounder who played 400 first-class games, and Madras cricket legend AG Ram Singh.Their mentorship helped him move up the levels of the game. It was batting that interested Gopinath the most, to the extent that he named his home in Coonoor “The Cover Drive”.Gopinath (front row, third from right) at a felicitation for Tamil Nadu’s Ranji Trophy winners from the 1954-55 and 1987-88 seasons•TNPL”There was a West Indian bowler called [Sonny] Ramadhin,” Gopinath said. “Those days, his early days, he was called the wonder bowler, and the previous season, West Indies toured England and they beat England because Ramadhin took so many wickets and the English batsmen could not spot what he was doing. He was a peculiar bowler. I don’t know how he did it. He would bowl the same way, one would go offbreak, one would go legbreak and you could never spot which way it was going.”I played against him in an unofficial Test for the Combined Universities against the Commonwealth Second Team in 1950. Again, because of destiny or luck or whatever, I happened to be at the non-striker’s end and I was watching him. I wanted to see if I could figure him out. Then some intuition told me that he normally bowled an offbreak, which was fairly quick, and when he tossed it a little bit, it was a legbreak. It was a blind kind of assessment. Just happened I was right and I hammered him all over. Every time he bowled a legbreak, he’d toss it up a little bit and I’d be ready for the square cut and I’d get four runs. I was top scorer that game. I made 93.”Gopinath had an instinct for batting and he was not shy about following it.”I was very thrilled when I faced Ray Lindwall for the first time. He was damn fast. By the time he played against me [in 1960], he must have been slower. But he was still really fast. One fast one on the leg side and I hooked him and I missed the six by five or ten feet. Immediately my captain said, ‘What are you doing? Don’t take chances!’ I said: what can you do with a short ball on the leg side!”Cricket allowed Gopinath to meet to new people.”I became friends with Lindwall that game, sitting and chatting. We became such good friends that we exchanged caps. I still have it somewhere.”Gopinath at home in Chennai•Alagappan Muthu/ESPNcricinfo LtdIt brought him recognition.Gopinath scored a hundred in the 1954-55 Ranji Trophy final when Madras won the tournament for the first time.It helped him win over his family, who once regarded him as an example of who not to be.”When my mother passed away and we were looking through her things, we found so many newspaper cuttings of me. She never told me, but all of it was there: I saved this match, I scored this century. And when my daughter saw that, she made a book of it.”The simple pleasure of picking up a bat and swinging it around changed Gopinath’s life and he never let the joy fade.”My coach Mr Wensley once advised me not to play the cut because I was getting out to it. ‘You play your drives and everything, you’re okay, but stop the square cut,’ he said. ‘That’s very difficult and you’re getting out.’ I tried to stop it and after a couple of matches, I went back to him and I told him, ‘I love that shot. I can’t do it.’ So he said, ‘Okay, if you’re that keen, don’t go opening. Move two-down, three-down.’ So I did and I never stopped the square cut.”Seeing me square-cut in that Combined Universities game, against Ramadhin, a foreign scribe, the Commonwealth team manager actually, wrote that I was the best exponent of the square cut in India. It was so funny!”I have never had any ambitions. I never wanted to get anywhere. Whatever happened to me happened because of my [destiny]. If I wanted to play for India and so on, I’d have been disappointed. But I never even thought about it. I never dreamt that I would play for India. It just came by. Same thing has happened to me in my life, in my work, and some of the things which at that time was, ‘Oh terrible, a terrible thing has happened’, now I realise I’m so glad that happened.”At some point, people grow up. They realise the perils of living for the moment, of chasing fleeting highs, like the feeling after playing a great shot, and weigh it against the downsides: its potential to get you out. It’s human nature. You want to do the best you can, so you strip the fun out of things.But take it from a 94-year-old who used to play tennis until four years ago, who was friends with Raman Subba Row, Frank Worrell and Denis Compton, who has seen the snowy peaks of Alaska and the breathtaking splendour of the Nile, who was chairman of the Madras Chamber of Commerce and who still serves on the board of several trusts: sometimes doing something just because it feels good is good.

New Zealand grateful for Devine intervention as plans come together in crucial contest

Ten T20I defeats in a row couldn’t sway resilient team from sticking to their guns in emphatic win

Shashank Kishore04-Oct-2024Sophie Devine had to scream her lungs out to get Maddy Green’s attention at long-off. She was unhappy with Green’s positioning and implored her to move a few yards to her right. The move was partly instinctive as much it was down to an understanding of Smriti Mandhana’s strengths, having played with her in the Women’s Premier League.Four balls into Eden Carson’s second over, the ploy was rewarded when Mandhana tempted fate and holed out to long-off. And just like that, Mandhana’s plans of playing a shot she scores a lot of runs off, especially early on against spin, were nipped in the bud.Devine revealed the plan for Mandhana was one among many that New Zealand put together for this World Cup opener, and while the results had been slow to come to fruition over the course of the previous year, what had remained was their steadfast belief in their methods.”Look, to be honest, we’ve been planning for this game for about, I don’t know, probably close to a year,” Devine said. “We’ve been really focused on this one game for a long time now, and the level of detail that we’ve gone into, in terms of match-ups, field settings, obviously it helps having played a little bit in the WPL.”It’s all well and good to have plans. If the bowlers can’t execute it, it doesn’t mean anything. But I thought the bowlers were outstanding. We were really clear around what plans we wanted to use and how we wanted to use them, and for them to execute and to pick up wickets regularly is something that I was really proud of. It’s a pretty cool feeling to have plans executed, and to be rewarded for it.”One of those plans that Devine touched upon, it seemed, was bowling a heavy ball. On a Dubai surface where the dew didn’t come on as anticipated, the ball was gripping more than a hint. And Lea Tahuhu showed the value of hitting hard lengths. The wickets of Jemimah Rodrigues, Richa Ghosh and Deepti Sharma were reward for that unwavering discipline.Tahuhu’s natural swing, courtesy of her slingy action, tends to take the ball away. While she isn’t the tallest bowler in the game, she has worked previously with Jacob Oram, the former New Zealand allrounder turned bowling coach, on a slower bouncer to complement her hard lengths.Friday’s plan was confirmation of the extent to which the players have bought into the team’s methods, without being swayed by the uncertainty that a series of insipid results, including 10 successive T20I losses, can bring.”I think a word that got used today when we were presenting our jerseys was ‘resilient’ and, when I think of resilient people, I think of Leah,” Devine said. “She’s obviously been in and out of the side, she’s battled through injuries, she’s obviously got a young family now, and [she showed] her ability to just keep bouncing back and then to perform in pressure situations like she did today.Related

Bates banking on familiarity and 'great mind space' in trans-Tasman clash

New Zealand shoot India out for 102 amid high drama to script big win

Harmanpreet & Co left fuming after Amelia Kerr run-out-that-wasn't drama

Rodrigues on batting at No. 5: 'I'm working on going all out from the first ball'

Harmanpreet set to end India's No. 3 roulette at T20 World Cup

“As a captain it’s a real privilege to be able to throw her the ball and know that she’s going to fight tooth and nail to do whatever she can for this team. And people like that are so important in a team environment, because that mongrel spirit is infectious and I thought she’s been great today. Long may it continue.”The brightest example of New Zealand’s spirit is Georgia Plimmer who was backed to open despite a horror run of form all through the summer. She made 26 runs in four innings during a winless England tour and had just one not-so-fluent half-century in the final T20I of an otherwise forgettable Australia tour.A T20I strike-rate that had been just a nudge above 84 revealed more than an inkling of struggle in the Powerplay. It may have been prudent for Devine to move up herself, but the New Zealand captain laid out what she termed a succession plan, for when she and Suzie Bates eventually decide to move on.One of those plans was to back Plimmer to find her feet in the pressure of international cricket. And on Friday, she launched a powerplay salvo that rattled India. In the context of her career and the match, Plimmer’s 23-ball 34 up top was worth so much more, even though there were other batters, such as Devine herself, whose unbeaten 36-ball 57 looks the more significant on the scorecard.”The cricket gods decided to be with us today and sometimes that’s all it is, isn’t it?,” Devine asked. “Sometimes you get a lucky bounce, sometimes you get, you know … a catch goes in the gap. I don’t think it’s through lack of effort, it’s not through lack of trying, it’s not through lack of preparation, I think it’s just sometimes the way cricket is.”So, I’m just really proud of this group to keep sticking at it, to keep believing in themselves. Trust me, we’ve been copping stuff from all over the place about the batting order, and I hope today shows exactly why we’ve been sticking with it for the last 12-18 months, because we believe in this batting order.”We believe in the openers, we believe in Melie [Amelia Kerr], and we believe in myself and the rest of the group. So hopefully that’s brought us a little bit of breathing space, but we know that it’s on us now to make sure that we back it up.”In a way, New Zealand played like a team that wasn’t burdened by the same expectations as India. Neither are they bound by history. Devine admits theirs is a transition that has loomed for longer than expected, which they’re trying to address in the best possible way.All told, New Zealand played like a team that would’ve embraced delight and dejection in equal measure, provided they didn’t deviate from plans that had been in the making for a while. And when the spotlight was on them on a grand stage against a more fancied opponent, they conjured magic to sting their opponents like few defeats in recent memory.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus